Dwight Freeney of the Indiana Colts is using chiropractic to heal his ankle

February 19th, 2010

I know, I know, it’s all over now but this caught my eye:

Dwight Freeney’s ankle injury was a major story in the run-up to the Superbowl. The Colts kept their cards close to the chest on the whole matter though some details have leaked as to what they did to treat the issue.

They are very active with their treatments and Freeney is using some methods that have helped him in the past. The main one is Dr. Leon Mellman, Freeney’s Chiropractor, who was making sure not only his ankle is getting the proper care, but is also monitoring how his newly guarded walk is effecting the rest of his body. Most notably how his lower back could be adversely affected due to his newly acquired limp.

Freeney’s injury was being treated as any other low ankle sprain would be in the NFL with some minor tweaks. Although he was seen in a supporting boot very recently, he spoke openly about keeping the motion in the ankle joint to promote healing. This became common place in joint surgeries; where immediately following the surgery, the joint are put into passive motion to prevent adhesion build-up and promote a quicker recovery. Freeney was spotted walking the beach without his boot on, most likely advised by team doctors for the same reason: a quicker recovery.

Bookmark and Share

Is chiropractic the right way to tackle low-back pain?

February 3rd, 2010

The Manga Report says it all:

F8.

In our view, the constellation of the evidence of:
1. the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of chiropractic management of low-back pain.

2. the untested, questionable or harmful nature of many current medical therapies .

3. the economic efficiency of chiropractic care for low-back pain compared with medical care.

4. the safety of chiropractic care.

5. the higher satisfaction levels expressed by patients of chiropractors, together

offers an overwhelming case in favor of much greater use of chiropractic services in the management of low-back pain.

And isn’t this really what it is all about – are patients satisfied with the treatment we offer – the answer is an overwhelming yes.

Bookmark and Share

Did you see this artical about banning butter?

January 18th, 2010

The artical is here.

Now let’s see what the response is from the butter board or whatever it’s called.

Bookmark and Share

Hitler was one of those Chiropractic denialists as well

January 14th, 2010

I saw this on youtube so it has to be true!

Bookmark and Share

Could Chiropractic prevent some cases of osteoarthritis – seems so.

January 5th, 2010

Rupert Clements, one of the chiros @ C1 writes about a powerful study showing a clear link between a lack of motion in the spinal joints and the development of osteoarthritis.

An interesting study was carried out by G.Cramer, J.Fournier, et al. in October last year titled:

Degenerative Changes Following Spinal Fixation in a Small Animal Model.

It was then published in the Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, Vol. 27 No. 3, Pgs. 141-154

The study evaluated changes in the small joints, the facet joints, of the lumbar spine after they were artificially fixed together and therefore prevented from moving.

LUMBAR facet JOINT Could Chiropractic prevent some cases of osteoarthritis   seems so.

The study used an established small animal (rat) model of spinal fixation (hypomobility) where 3 contiguous lumbar segments (L4, L5, L6) were fixed with a specially engineered vertebral fixation device. Spinal segments of control rats were compared with those of animals whose spines had been fixed for 1, 4, or 8 weeks. Subgroups of these fixation animals subsequently had the fixation device removed for 1, 2, 4, 8, or 12 weeks to evaluate the effects of attempting to re-establish normal forces to the vertebral segments following hypomobility. The joints that were fixated were examined microscopically to determine how the lack of motion affected the health of the joints. By using small animals such as mice or rats, the changes they go through in a study can be very closely observed in a way that, clearly, they can’t be in human studies.

The conclusion: These findings indicate that fixation (hypomobility) results in time-dependent degenerative changes of the Z joints (the small facet joints in the spine).

The study was a high quality study which produced some highly meaningful information.

So, what did they find? The joints that were immobilized began to break down and degenerate, while the joints that moved remained healthy. The type of breakdown that the researchers found in the fixated joints was the same as in osteoarthritis; which is the most common type of arthritis and while there are many types of arthritis, this is the type people are generally referring to when they say ‘arthritis’. They also found that the longer the joint did not move the more degenerative arthritic changes it showed. The point is that this reflects the same processes that occur in you and I and that is why it is so valuable.

So who do I pass this on to? Anyone who mentions suffering from, or wanting to avoid, arthritis. Or better yet, pass it on to the person you know who is already very health conscious, wants to stay active, and wants to learn how chiropractic care can help keep them moving and healthy!

Bookmark and Share